Language

Canadian Firearms Program · Plain-language reference

What Canadian law actually says about firearms

Firearms policy in Canada is genuinely contested — reasonable people disagree about where the lines should sit. This guide doesn't take a side in that debate. It exists to lay out, clearly and with citations, what the law currently requires: how firearms are classified, what recent legislation changed, and what the disputed terms actually mean in regulation versus everyday speech.

Before you rely on anything here: firearms law changes through Orders in Council, court rulings, and new regulations — sometimes with little notice. This page reflects the framework as of mid-2026. Cross-check anything that affects your legal standing against the official sources linked at the bottom of this page.
Non-restricted Most common hunting rifles and shotguns. No registration required; a valid licence is.
Restricted Most handguns, some semi-auto rifles. Requires registration and an RPAL.
Prohibited Automatic firearms, and hundreds of named models banned since 2020. Civilian possession barred, with narrow grandfathering.

01 · The legal framework

How a firearm gets classified

Every firearm in Canada falls into one of three legal categories under Criminal Code s.84 and the Firearms Act. Classification isn't a judgment call made case-by-case by an officer — it's determined centrally and recorded in the RCMP's Firearms Reference Table (FRT), a database that assigns every known make and model to a class based on its technical characteristics and, for some categories, explicit lists in regulation.

Non-restricted

The default category. Covers most ordinary hunting and sporting rifles and shotguns — generally break-action, bolt-action, lever-action, and many semi-automatic long guns not otherwise restricted or prohibited by name.

  • Requires a Possession and Acquisition Licence (PAL)
  • No firearm registration required since the long-gun registry was abolished in 2012
  • Subject to standard safe storage rules
Restricted

Includes most handguns, and semi-automatic centre-fire rifles/shotguns with a barrel shorter than 470 mm that aren't prohibited outright.

  • Requires an RPAL (the restricted-class endorsement) and registration of the specific firearm
  • Since October 2022, a nationwide freeze blocks new handgun acquisitions and transfers for most individuals, with narrow exceptions (e.g., elite sport shooters, some professional uses)
  • Transport is limited to authorized purposes (e.g., to/from a range) under an Authorization to Transport
Prohibited

The most restrictive tier. Covers fully automatic firearms, converted automatics, sawed-off long guns, certain compact handguns — and, since May 2020, over 1,500 specifically named makes and models the government classifies as "assault-style."

  • New civilian acquisition is barred
  • Owners who held a now-prohibited model before the relevant ban date may qualify for limited grandfathering or compensation (see Section 03)
  • Unauthorized possession is a criminal offence under Criminal Code s.92

Note

Classification can change by regulation without amending the Criminal Code itself — this is how the 2020 prohibitions and later additions took effect, through Orders in Council rather than a new Act of Parliament. Bill C-21 (2023) removed the Governor in Council's power to move a firearm to a less restrictive class, so reclassification can now only tighten, not loosen, going forward.

02 · Disputed language

"Assault rifle" vs. "assault-style" vs. "semi-automatic"

This is where most public confusion — and most of the political disagreement — actually lives. The terms sound similar but do different work. Below is what each one means technically, and how the debate over their use breaks down.

/legal & technical term/

Assault rifle

Common confusion Civilian semi-automatic rifles that share a military-style profile are frequently called "assault rifles" in everyday and media use, even though they fire only one round per trigger pull — the defining legal distinction.
/regulatory & political term/

"Assault-style" firearm

Why it's contested Critics (including firearms-owner groups) argue "assault-style" describes cosmetic features (appearance, furniture) rather than function, and that the 2020 list was compiled without a consistent mechanical test. Gun-control advocates counter that the named models share functional traits — rate of fire, magazine capacity, ergonomics for rapid target engagement — that justify treating them as a category regardless of the label's precision.
Argument for the term Proponents say plain-language labels help the public understand risk even where a precise mechanical definition is complex, and that the underlying prohibition list — not the label — is what has legal force.
Argument against the term Critics say "assault-style" is imprecise enough to sweep in firearms functionally identical to unrestricted hunting rifles, and prefer classification tied strictly to measurable technical criteria.
/technical term/

Semi-automatic

Where it applies Semi-automatic firearms span all three classification tiers: many common hunting rifles are semi-automatic and non-restricted; some are restricted based on barrel length; others are prohibited by name or by the post-2023 technical definition. Being semi-automatic alone does not determine a firearm's legal class.

03 · Timeline

What's changed, and when

Canada's firearms framework has moved through several major changes since 2019. This timeline focuses on what took legal effect and what remains in flux.

June 2019

Bill C-71 receives Royal Assent

Expanded background-check scope, added retailer record-keeping requirements, and changed transport authorization rules for restricted and prohibited firearms.

May 1, 2020

Order in Council prohibits 1,500+ models

The government prohibited over 1,500 makes and models it classified as assault-style firearms, including the AR-15 platform, across nine defined categories. Existing owners were placed under a rolling amnesty rather than immediate criminal liability.

October 2022

National handgun freeze

A regulatory freeze blocked most new handgun acquisitions, transfers, and importation by individuals, alongside the introduction of Bill C-21.

December 2023

Bill C-21 receives Royal Assent

Added a forward-looking technical definition for future assault-style firearm designs, removed the government's power to reclassify a firearm to a less restrictive category, created new "red flag" and "yellow flag" provisions for risk-related licence suspension, and increased penalties for smuggling and trafficking.

2024 – 2025

Further prohibitions and buyback rollout

Additional Orders in Council named further models as prohibited. The Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program (buyback) began onboarding businesses and, later, individual owners, with a declaration window opening in early 2026.

Still being implemented
2026 – ongoing

Amnesty tied to a pending court challenge

The 2020, 2024, and 2025 amnesty orders — which shield owners of newly prohibited models from criminal liability while compensation is arranged — are currently set to expire 90 days after the Supreme Court of Canada rules on a pending appeal challenging the 2020 prohibition. Some official and secondary sources also cite an October 30, 2026 target date. Because this is actively moving, treat any specific expiry date as provisional and confirm directly with Public Safety Canada.

Date not final — verify before relying on it

04 · The data

Gun crime in Canada, by the numbers

The headline figures move in different directions depending on the window you look at — down year-over-year in 2024, up over the past decade — and the data on who commits firearm crime is central to the policy debate. All figures below are from Statistics Canada's Juristat and Homicide Survey publications and the RCMP's Commissioner of Firearms Report, the most recent releases available as of this update.

36.0 per 100,000 population

The firearm-related violent crime rate in 2024 — about 14,500 incidents. Down 4.2% from 37.6 in 2023, the largest single-year decrease since 2014.

287 firearm-related homicides, 2024

36% of Canada's 788 homicides in 2024 involved a firearm. Handguns were used in 56% of those; rifles and shotguns in 34%.

80% of firearm-homicide accused, unlicensed

Of 2024 firearm-related homicides where the accused's identity was known, 80% of accused persons did not hold a valid licence for the class of firearm used in the offence.

2.46M licensed firearm holders, 2025

Total PAL/RPAL holders reported by the RCMP for 2025 (often rounded to "2.5 million" in public discussion), up 1.9% from 2024.

The trend line, and where it's headed

2024's year-over-year decline is real, but it sits inside a longer upward trend: Statistics Canada describes a general upward trajectory in firearm-related violent crime since the mid-2010s, meaning a single good year doesn't yet reverse the decade-long pattern. Within that, one category has been rising steadily — crimes involving firearm-like weapons (pellet guns, air guns, and unidentified firearms), which StatCan flags as a distinct and growing subset separate from the decline in handgun and rifle/shotgun rates.

Licensed owners and the crime data

Canada's roughly 2.46 million licensed owners are, on the statistics above, a small minority of those involved in firearm crime: 4 in 5 accused in firearm homicides with a known identity did not hold a valid licence for the firearm they used. That doesn't mean licensed owners are never involved — the 20% who did hold a valid licence is not zero — but the data does not support treating the licensed-owner population as the primary driver of firearm violence. StatCan and the RCMP instead point toward illegal firearms — smuggled, diverted, or unlawfully manufactured — as the dominant supply behind firearm crime.

Where the illegal firearms come from

Statistics Canada's most recent Juristat report links the crime trend to two supply-side sources in particular:

  • Cross-border smuggling. Canada Border Services Agency data show an increase in firearms seizures at the border since the 2020/2021 fiscal year — the period StatCan's report cites directly as evidence of a growing smuggling channel, much of it linked to trafficking routes from the United States.
  • Unlawful domestic manufacturing. StatCan also points to new technologies, particularly 3D printing, as a factor behind a rise in illegally manufactured firearms ("ghost guns") that don't originate from either licensed retail or smuggling, and therefore aren't captured by either registration or border enforcement.

Also relevant to context: 58% of individuals accused of a firearm-related violent crime in 2024 had a prior record involving at least one previous violent crime (firearm-related or not) between 2018 and 2024, and gang-related homicides — 152 in 2024, down from 174 in 2023 — made up about one-fifth of all homicides, pointing to a concentration of firearm violence among a comparatively small, often previously-known population rather than a broad cross-section of gun owners or the general public.

Reading these numbers responsibly

Two things can be true at once: firearm-related violent crime has trended upward over the past decade, and the population of legally licensed owners is not where that trend is concentrated. Advocacy groups on different sides of this issue tend to emphasize one half of that picture over the other — the decade-long rise, or the licensing/smuggling breakdown. Both halves come from the same StatCan releases and are accurate; neither alone is the complete picture.

05 · Checking common claims

Myths vs. facts

Claims about Canadian firearms law circulate widely on both sides of the debate, often stated with more confidence than the underlying law or data supports. Below are commonly repeated claims, checked directly against the legal text and statistics covered elsewhere on this page.

Myth"The 2020 ban only targets fully automatic assault weapons."
FactFully automatic weapons have been tightly restricted in Canada since 1978, long before 2020. The May 2020 Order in Council prohibited a list of over 1,500 semi-automatic makes and models by name — see Section 02 for the technical distinction between the two.
Myth"Licensed firearm owners are the main source of gun crime in Canada."
FactIn 80% of 2024 firearm-related homicides where the accused's identity was known, the accused did not hold a valid licence for the firearm class used. StatCan and the RCMP point to smuggling and illegal domestic manufacturing as the larger supply-side drivers — see Section 04.
Myth"The government is confiscating all firearms from all Canadian owners."
FactThe buyback/compensation program applies specifically to the models newly prohibited since 2020, not to firearms in general. Participation for individual owners has been structured around a declaration and compensation process, not blanket seizure — though possession without authorization after the amnesty expires does become a criminal offence. See Section 03.
Myth"Canada still maintains a national registry tracking every rifle and shotgun."
FactThe federal long-gun registry was abolished in 2012. Non-restricted firearms — the category most hunting rifles and shotguns fall into — are not individually registered today. Restricted and prohibited firearms still are. See Section 01.
Myth"The 2022 handgun freeze means existing handgun owners had to surrender theirs."
FactThe freeze blocks new acquisitions and transfers for most individuals going forward. It doesn't retroactively require licensed owners to give up handguns they already legally possessed. See Section 01.
Myth"Gun crime in Canada is at an all-time high and rising every year without exception."
Fact2024 saw the largest single-year drop in firearm-related violent crime in a decade. That said, Statistics Canada also describes a general upward trend since the mid-2010s, so a single strong year doesn't reverse the longer pattern either. Both are true at once — see Section 04.
Myth"A firearm classified as prohibited or restricted today could later be downgraded if government policy changes."
FactBill C-21 (2023) removed the Governor in Council's authority to reclassify a firearm to a less restrictive category. Regulatory reclassification can currently only move a firearm to a more restrictive class. See Section 01.
Myth"None of the firearms used for hunting have been affected by the bans — only military-style weapons are prohibited."
FactNot entirely accurate. While most hunting rifles and shotguns remain non-restricted, some models commonly used for hunting — including certain semi-automatic shotguns used for waterfowling — were named in the prohibited list, despite government statements that hunters would not be targeted. Whether a specific hunting firearm is affected depends on its make, model, and technical specifications, not on its intended use. See Section 03.

A note on where these claims come from

These are patterns of misunderstanding that show up repeatedly in public discussion — in comment sections, social media, and casual conversation — on both sides of the debate, not statements from any single named source. The goal here is to correct the substance of the claim, not to single out who said it.

06 · For owners and prospective owners

Licensing, storage, and transport

Regardless of what class of firearm someone owns, Canadian law layers licensing, safe-storage, and (for restricted items) transport requirements on top of classification.

01

Take the required safety course

The Canadian Firearms Safety Course (CFSC) is mandatory for a non-restricted PAL; the Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course (CRFSC) is additionally required for an RPAL. Both end in a written and practical test.

02

Apply for a licence (PAL or RPAL)

Applications go through the Canadian Firearms Program and include background screening, references, and — for most applicants — notification of a spouse or partner. Licences are typically valid for five years.

03

Register restricted or prohibited firearms

Non-restricted firearms don't require individual registration. Restricted and (grandfathered) prohibited firearms must be registered to a specific licensed owner.

04

Store firearms according to class

Non-restricted firearms must be unloaded and either rendered inoperable with a secure locking device or stored in a locked container/room. Restricted and prohibited firearms have stricter requirements, generally a secure locked container plus a trigger or cable lock, or storage at an approved club or range.

05

Get an Authorization to Transport (ATT), where required

Moving a restricted or prohibited firearm outside your residence — to a range, a gunsmith, or a border crossing point, for example — generally requires an ATT specifying the purpose and route.

07 · Frequently asked

Common questions and misconceptions

Does owning a semi-automatic rifle make it an "assault rifle"?
No. "Assault rifle" is a technical term for a select-fire or fully automatic weapon — those have been tightly restricted in Canada since 1978. A semi-automatic rifle fires one round per trigger pull, the same action type used in many ordinary hunting rifles. Some semi-automatic rifles are prohibited by name or design criteria (see Section 02), but that's a separate legal question from whether the firearm is automatic.
Is Canada's long-gun registry still active?
No. The federal long-gun registry, which tracked non-restricted firearms, was abolished in 2012 (Quebec separately maintained a provincial registry for a period afterward, which has since wound down). Restricted and prohibited firearms are still individually registered federally.
If I already owned a firearm that got prohibited in 2020, am I now a criminal?
Not automatically. Amnesty orders have shielded existing owners of newly prohibited models from criminal liability while the government arranges compensation or, in some cases, permits continued limited use (for licensed sport shooters, for instance). That said, the amnesty is time-limited and its expiry has shifted before — see the timeline in Section 03 for the current status, and confirm your specific situation with Public Safety Canada or a firearms lawyer.
Can a firearm be reclassified to be less restrictive?
Not by the Governor in Council anymore. Bill C-21 removed that downgrade authority in 2023, meaning regulatory reclassification can now only move a firearm to a more restrictive category, not a less restrictive one.
Does a handgun freeze mean existing handgun owners have to give theirs up?
No. The October 2022 freeze blocks new acquisitions and transfers for most individuals; it doesn't retroactively strip licensed owners of handguns they already legally possessed. Existing owners can generally keep and use their registered handguns under their licence.
Where do the 1,500+ "prohibited" models come from — is there a public list?
Yes. The specific makes and models are named in regulation and catalogued in the RCMP's Firearms Reference Table, with summary lists also published by the RCMP and by third-party trackers. See Section 06 for official links.
✎ Opinion · not a factual claim

08 · A closing argument

And now what?

Everything above this point on the page describes what the law says and what the data show. This section is different: it's a point of view, built on that same data, about what should follow from it. Reasonable people looking at the same numbers reach different conclusions — a counterpoint from the other side of this debate follows at the end.

Since 2020, Canada's major firearms measures — the assault-style firearms prohibition, the national handgun freeze, and the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program — have overwhelmingly targeted the legal market: the roughly 2.46 million Canadians who passed a background check, took a safety course, and hold a valid licence. That's a defensible policy choice if licensed owners were where the risk was concentrated. The data in Section 04 suggests they aren't.

Four out of five people accused in a 2024 firearm homicide with a known identity did not hold a valid licence for the gun they used. Border seizures have risen since 2020/2021, pointing to smuggling as a growing channel. Illegal domestic manufacturing — 3D-printed "ghost guns" in particular — is rising too, and by definition sits entirely outside the licensing and registration system these measures expand. Fifty-eight percent of people accused of firearm violence had a prior violent-crime record. Nearly a fifth of all homicides were gang-related. None of that population is touched by tightening rules on licensed ownership, because none of it was operating inside that system in the first place.

Spending years of regulatory and enforcement effort re-classifying and buying back firearms already held legally, while the growth in smuggled and illegally manufactured guns continues on a separate track, risks measuring success by compliance from the group least connected to the harm — while the actual growth channels go comparatively under-resourced.

What the data points toward instead

  • 01Border and smuggling interdiction. If CBSA seizure data show a rising smuggling channel, resourcing for interdiction at that channel should rise to match — not just resourcing for domestic licence administration.
  • 02Enforcement against illegal manufacturing. Ghost guns and 3D-printed firearms sit outside the registration system by design; closing that gap requires investigative and forensic capacity aimed at illegal manufacture, not rules aimed at licensed retail.
  • 03Targeted, repeat-offender and gang-focused enforcement. With 58% of accused persons carrying a prior violent-crime record and gang activity involved in roughly a fifth of homicides, resourcing focused on that comparatively small, already-known population offers a more direct path to reducing firearm violence than broad rules affecting the wider licensed population.
  • 04Mental-health crisis response and threat assessment. The "red flag" and "yellow flag" provisions in Bill C-21 already give courts and Chief Firearms Officers tools to intervene before a licensed individual in crisis becomes a risk. Fully resourcing crisis intervention teams and follow-through on those provisions matters as much as the provisions existing on paper.
  • 05Community violence-intervention programs. Public health-style interventions aimed at the specific, identifiable populations and neighbourhoods most affected by gang and repeat-offender violence have shown results in other jurisdictions and target the concentration point directly rather than the general licensed population.

None of this requires ignoring firearms policy altogether, and it doesn't mean licensing, storage, and safety requirements for legal owners should disappear — those rules are cheap to maintain and not the source of public complaint. It means the next round of resourcing and legislative attention could reasonably follow the data in Section 04 toward smuggling, illegal manufacturing, and the comparatively small population of repeat violent offenders, rather than continuing to concentrate primarily on the licensed ownership system.

09 · Go to the source

Official resources

This page is a plain-language starting point, not a substitute for the primary sources. For anything that affects your legal standing, confirm directly with the following.